The term “strategy” is perhaps one of the most misused, and misunderstood concepts in business literature. In this series of blog posts, we refer to strategy as positioning the firm with respect to its environment. We endeavor to answer the questions: how can we (a) improve the process of strategic management through the use of models, and (b) improve the execution/implementation of strategies with Enterprise Architecture Management?
Strategists often deal with the resolution of strategic issues such as:
It is often assumed that dealing with these issues is both rational and deliberate/planned (5 year plans). However, in practice this is often not the case. For many organizations, the process of strategizing is far from planned, and takes on a more creative character. Often, it is only in hindsight that one can discern a pattern in the stream of strategic choices that have been made.
There are differing opinions on how to solve the different strategic issues. For example, for the issue of competitive advantage, some writers proclaim that an inside-out approach (AKA ‘resource-based view’, referring to dynamic capabilities of organizations) is best: start with what you’re good at, develop products and find appropriate markets. Others claim the exact opposite and adopt an outside-in approach (Blue ocean – seeking uncontested market space, or Red Ocean – trying to improve in existing markets). Find a market where you expect to be successful and develop an appropriate activity system/resource base.
Similarly for the issue of synergies versus responsiveness, some authors claim that the best way to be successful for a multi-business organization is to maximize synergies between businesses:
Some would argue the exact opposite and propose a portfolio approach. The central idea of this approach is that by offering maximum freedom, businesses have the biggest chance to be successful. By spreading business risk over several businesses, the long term success of the portfolio is likely to be maximized.
In order to improve (a) deliberate/rational strategizing, and (b) communication about all aspects of strategy, several models have been proposed. These models can be used to assist in rational and planned decision-making, but also to document and communicate about strategies that are “discovered” in hindsight using a more creative/incremental approach to strategic management.
Important models to consider in this context are:
In our opinion, the act of strategizing, and answering difficult questions about what the organization strives to be, is what strategic management is all about. Whether models are used to rationalize the strategic options/decision-making process of an organization, or if they are used to “merely” document the outcome of the strategic process in hindsight: we strongly believe that models are an indispensable tool for long term success of the organization: by combining (the results of) different strategic models, strategists broaden their horizon and break free from a single-paradigm view of the world.
In the next post in this series, I will discuss the business model canvas as a tool to (a) give an integrated view on the strategy of an organization, either in an as-is situation or in the future, and (b) show how existing models such as outlined in this post can help to fill in this canvas.